*
Porn Review
Reply
Smiles
Your name:
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Close tags
[quote="InterCity125"]If you suffer from migraine avoid this site - it might prove fatal. If you don't suffer from migraine but think you might like to then take out a month's subscription. From the point of view of navigation this is undoubtedly the worst site I have ever come across. It takes THREE steps from the model index to reach the full size pictures. There are no short cuts and believe me I tried everything I could think of - different browsers, various DL managers, site rippers, image spiders etc,etc. Nothing worked. Contrary to the review of this site there are no ZIPs. So if there are twenty shots in the set it's going to take you a minimum of 120 clicks to save them all (thumbnail index > medium sized preview > full size image > drag to desktop to save > close full size image tab > advance to next medium sized preview image). Be prepared to sit in front of the computer for hours slaving away. To add to the pleasure of the experience the server is slow, with most decent sites the jpegs come up with no perceptible delay with this one the full sized images take 3-4 seconds each. There's also an advertising banner flashing away on the right of the screen offering you the chance to buy on DVD the same content you've already paid to get access to via the web. My guess is that the site is deliberately difficult to navigate so that you'll get sick of trying that you'll buy the DVD. Don't bother. There are only 17 models at least a third of whom must be over 40. Only about half have what could honestly be described as 'extra large' boobs - the rest are above average but not that exceptional but at least they're in their early twenties. There are only about an average of 200 pics of each model, some have video some don't. There's no hardcore and not even full nudity in many cases. The photography is amateurish with many instances where the next photograph in the sequence is so close to the previous one that you wonder whether it isn't the same. The site claims to update but my guess is that the webmaster is just putting up a few more pictures that were shot years ago in the same modelling sessions that you've already seen. The combination of bad site design, slow server response, no ZIPs, limited content, very little genuinely new material being posted, generally below average models and amateurish photography leads me to the conclusion that this is a 'one man' effort.[/quote]
Settings:
HTML
Off
BBCode
On
Smiles
On
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Reload
captcha
image
Captcha code:
new!
Write a short review of any site existing in our ratings and get the prize:
15-min prepaid
pin-code to
HotMovies.com
— giant movie achive!
Read more »
You have switched off topic preview option. You can chznge your settings in your
profile
.
Follow @porninspector
About us
|
Privacy Policy
|
2257 Statement
|
Review Request
|
Support
PornInspector.com
Discounts
Categories
Sample Videos
Sample Galleries
Featured Models
Forum
Amateur
Anal Sex
Asians
Babes
Bbw
Bdsm
Bisexuals
Bizarre
Black
Breasts
Celebs
Cum Shots
Dating
Drunk
Ethnic
FemDom
Fetish
Fiction
For Women
Gay
Group Sex
Hardcore
Hentai & Cartoons
Interracial Sex
Latina
Lesbians
Lingerie
Megasites
MILF
Mobile
Site Networks
Nudists
Old & Young
Older Women
Oral Sex
PornStars
Single Models
Smoking
Softcore
Software
Spanking
Squirting
Teens
Toys & Masturbation
Transsexuals
Variety
Video
Voyeur
VR Porn
Watersports
Web Cams
News
Polls
My Profile
*
Subscribe
Newsletter example »
FAQ
|
Inspectors
|
Friends
|
Site map
Advanced Search
*
Featured Sites
Hegre Art
(5)
Abby Winters
(5)
Private.com
(5)
Reality Kings
(5)
Kink.com
(5)