Cum On Wives[Visit site]
They say Soccer Moms and lonely housewives suck dick like true champs. And, judging by these raunchy home-movies, that's a more than fair assessment.
Complete review published on 04.17.2014
Be the first to write a comment
Click here to visit site
If you're into blowjobs, housewives and gooey facials, then you should give Cum On Wives a look. The tour promises 6 updates every week, each featuring an amateur housewife "giving blowjobs and receiving big loads!" They boast some pretty hefty numbers, too: 2,600+ videos and 50,000+ photographs. And they have some mighty impressive teasers to back it up. Where do I sign-up again?
[v]Content Amount(5)Last updated on June 19, 2014.
Over 3377 videos about 4 minutes each (download and stream)
DRM: No restrictions
MPEG-4 (2200kb/s, 640x480)
MPEG-4 (1800kb/s, 640x480)
MPEG-4 (1100kb/s, 640x480)
Over 961 galleries about 50 pictures each
+ Fullscreen pictures
[v]PricesLast updated on June 19, 2014.
$1 / one day(recurs at $39.98 monthly) (recurring)
$24.96 / one month (recurring)
$59.78 / three months (recurring)
$99.95 / one year (non-recurring)
Boy, they sure weren't kidding about those tour promises. Once logged in, I couldn't help but be impressed by Cum On Wives' archive. First off, that claim of no porn stars or special FX shenanigans is, without a doubt, absolutely true. I must have watched damn near 100 scenes during my stay, and at least peaked at double that, and not a single one resembled a fancy porn set or featured a recognizable face. Quite the contrary, actually. This is due to the fact that their archive is 100% user-submitted. In fact, there's even a static "Submit Content" button at the top of every page ó you know, just in case you get the itch to record yourself jizzing on your wife's face and, through the kindness of your heart, share it with the rest of us poor bastards.
But even if that button weren't there, there'd still be no mistaking these scenes as anything but the real deal. Between the often poorly lit, shabbily decorated rooms, sometimes less than average(though not often) women, and the fact that popular songs and movies can be heard in the background of some of these clips, it's pretty much a no-brainer. All the hallmarks of amateur porn are there.
That's not to say this material isn't hot as fuck, though. Just because these girls aren't stars doesn't mean they can't suck a mean dick. Besides, the fact that there's no big budgets or casting calls means a lot less wait between updates. Which probably accounts for their awesome numbers. By this reviewers count, the site currently holds 961 photo sets and 3377 clips. And, believe you me, that's more jizz than I'd care to imagine.
One drawback with amateur content, however, is that, well, it can be quite inconsistent in terms of overall quality. This is a given, and this site is no exception. Lighting, not surprisingly, varied wildly from scene to scene. Some were brighter than most studios, whilst others were so dimly lit as to be distracting. The biggest problem overall, though, was play-back quality. Naturally, with an archive this size, many of these scenes are well before the advent of cheap, high-quality consumer grade cameras. And, for whatever reason, none of the newer updates fall into the HD category, either. Hell, there's even a few grainy webcam videos that were submitted, no doubt, but kinky exhibitionists. Still, I suppose a bit of grain is the name of the game when it comes to amateur porn. Adds to the charm, you know?
Thankfully, this wasn't as big of an issue when it came to the photo sets. Although far from high-res(most don't go beyond 1,000 pixel width) these babies are well lit and, for the most part, pretty darn clear. But what surprised me most, considering these actually are amateur shots, was the high image count. Most sets contain 30-50 shots, which is pretty damn good considering how hard it must be for an amateur to focus on more than a few shots in the heat of the moment. I think this comes down to the high number of swingers involved, though. I mean, somebody has to be taking the photos, right?
Going back to the videos, it's worth noting that there's not a lot of options. In fact, you have two choices: stream or download. The latter is always in the MPEG-4 format, and, depending on when you download, the transfer rate can be quite slow ó think 600 kilobytes-per-second, and you'll be on the right track. But considering the relatively low quality of the scenes and the scant(4-5 minutes on average) running times, and it tends to even out.
The main area the site should probably improve on, however, is its navigation. Outside of a very basic keyword search, member ratings and niche tags, there's really not much here that could be classified as a browse-tool. There's not even any main categories for quickly splitting up the scenes. I also found it a bit disconcerting that there were no timestamps, making it near impossible for the new member to authenticate their update schedule. In their defense, though, I tracked quite a bit of activity during my stay, and their numbers don't exactly indicate a lackadaisical schedule. Either way, they really should consider giving the whole site a makeover. And timestamps are a must.
Cum On Wives lives up to its title and its tour promises. Whether you're into amateur porn, MILFs, or you just like raunchy blowjobs, you should have no problems finding something here that'll tickle your fancy. On the downside, video quality, by and large, is quite poor. So, if you're looking for HD video and pristine lighting, this isn't your site. If, on the other hand, you want to watch gritty, 100% real amateur oral, I think you'll be quite satisfied. The husbands sure seem to be.
Click here to visit Cum On Wives