SWEET 18 HD REVIEW

 
*
Site Rating (3)
1
Site Promises****/*
2
Site Usability****
3
Content Amount**
4
Content Quality****/*
5
Updates Frequency*
6
Users Rating***/*
 
Total Rating***

Sweet 18 HD

[Visit site]
Looks can be decieving; even the most innocent of flesh can be corrupted. You'll figure that out fast if you hang around here, though.
Site type: Pay site, category: Teens, Video, Amateur
Complete review published on 04.26.2014
Rate site quality:
Be the first to write a comment

[v]Intro promises(4.5)

Visit Sweet 18 HD
Click here to visit site
Sweet 18 HD sure knows how to sell their site. The tour page has a simple approach ó bombarding would-be members with image after image of drop-dead-gorgeous teen models. And they promise that we'll get to see photos and HD video of these beauties engaged in "fetish and solo masturbation action." And for a more than reasonable monthly rate, too. Why, it's almost too good to be true.

[v]Content Amount(2)Last updated on June 24, 2014.

Videos:
Over 41 videos about 17 minutes each (download and stream)
DRM: No restrictions
+ Full Movies
Format:
WMV (5000kb/s, 1280x720)
Flash (640x360)
MP4 (4000kb/s, 1280x720)
MP4 (1000kb/s, 640x360)
MP4 (some latest vids) (6000kb/s, 1920x1080)
Pictures:
Over 24 galleries about 90 pictures each
+ Zip archives

[v]PricesLast updated on June 24, 2014.

$1 / one month (then $16.95 every 30 days) (recurring)

[v]Impression(4)


Sweet 18 HD certainly lives up to its name. Though the site is still quite new, they've somehow managed to produce 24 sets and 41 scenes showing ridiculously hot young models getting themselves off. Speaking of which, the models are really what caught my eye on the tour, so I naturally gravitated toward the index once inside the members' area. And I found 31 stunners, all fresh faced and glowing. No caked on make-up to hide years of wear-and-tear. So, if you're looking for pristine, grade-A teen ass, you've come to the right place.

Going back to the content, though, it's worth noting that these scenes are intimate solo affairs. So, if you're looking for big muscular studs tearing apart teen pussy, this isn't the site for you. No, I'm afraid that, outside of a sex toy and their wits, these girls are totally unaccompanied. You won't even hear a soundtrack ó not unless you count the occasional dirty-talk peppered in. What you will get, however, is an excellent view of flawless flesh, and some pretty intense orgasms, too.

I was also quite impressed with the smooth camera work and stellar play-back quality. Each scene can be downloaded in your choice of 720p H.D. or, if you prefer, a much quicker downloading S.D. file. You can stream the scenes, too, but only in one resolution size. The embedded player is YouTube style and every scene I tried streamed without a hitch. Download weren't too shabby, either. Last I checked they were clocking in at a hair under a meg-per-second.

Photography fans shouldn't be disappointed, either. Well, at least not when it comes to quality. Every gallery holds 100 or more high-res, expertly shot pictures. The watermarks are translucent and placed in the bottom corner, too, so you don't have to worry about them blocking the naughty bits. There's no multiple resolutions, but you can view the images on-site or download them in a ZIP.

Overall, navigation is pretty lacking. I could actually see the current setup appealing to newer users who are more apt to be confused by complex layouts. All in all, though, I think that, as is, the page is far too simplistic. As I write this, all the user has for "browse tools" is a very basic menu. There isn't even a search engine. For the time being, a whole host of browse-tools isn't really necessary. But once their archive grows a bit, they'll surely find themselves needing more than this skeleton of a site.

I mean, the site does at times feel like a work in progress. The model index is a good example of this. Currently it only houses head-shots and names. There's no model profiles, no links to their content ó no links at all actually. But since the site is relatively new, I suppose it's best we give them the benefit of the doubt.

One mishap that's harder to excuse, however, is the lack of timestamps on their updates. Only the last five updates are date-marked, which makes it difficult to put pin them down to any sort of reliable update schedule. The only thing I can gather from this small sample is that they added three videos in January, none in February, and, so far, 2 in March. So, if we're really kind and give them a pass for February, that's three updates per month. Either way, this can't inspire confidence in new members, so they may want to consider adding timestamps to all of their updates in the future.

[v]Conclusion(3)

Sweet 18 HD doesn't have a whole lot in the way of content just yet, and their layout could use a bit of work, too. However, this site is a real up-and-cummer, and I'm confident that, given time, they'll be a real contender in the teen genre. With content this hot, I'd be shocked with anything less.
Inspector: BeerhatMcfly
Click here to visit Sweet 18 HD
PornInspector.com
Discounts Categories Sample Videos Sample Galleries Featured Models Forum News Polls
My Profile
*

Outside reviews

Overall score, 4.2
FAQ | Inspectors | Friends | Site map
 
*
Top Women