Author |
|
|||||
kit
Webmaster Registred: 07.02.03 Posts: 349 |
You can post your opinion about „Pier 999“!
Please help us build an impartial review for each featured site! |
|||||
User's Reviews | ||||||
smm Registred: 02.02.06 Posts: 5 |
Quality is good, not quite up there with Viv Thomas or DDF, but respectable. There are far too few sets to justify the $30 price tag. |
|||||
Hugo45 Registred: 08.19.06 Posts: 3 |
These guys set the bar for image quality. I haven't seen anything better. Images are tack sharp. Skin tone is right-on. Lighting is excellent. The down side is that their models are too flat-chested. I would like more hard-core. Also, the logos are too big. If you want beautiful portraits of pussies, this is the place. |
|||||
jackmahog Registred: 08.15.04 Posts: 33 |
This isn't a bad site but it is really pissing me off. First, you need great looking girls. They have that. Second, the photography needs to be good. They have high quality images, good lighting, etc. Now for the problem. I like gorgeous girls in lingerie or slutty dresses and stuff. Once they get naked I generally lose interest. I like masturbation and boy-girl, but the girls have to be falling out of slutty clothes or lingerie. As far as plain old pictures of sexy clothes, lingerie catalog style. they don't have much, they have some, but not much. They don't have alot of lingerie anyway. The photographer ruins (in my opinion) about half of the entire photo inventory by tilting his camera, so a girl standing goes diagonally across the picture. After the introductory shots, they have alot of pictures that are either tilted, or shot from a weird angle or the girl is in a weird sideways or skewed position. Half of the entire photo inventory is shot very close up. The top of the girl's head is cut off, the bottom of her butt is cut off and the edges of her arms and legs are cut off. There is alot of masturbation and dildos, but the pictures are tilted or shot so close up her face and pussy are often one is in focus and one is not. Like most sites, they don't start playing with themselves until they are totally naked. Most frontal shots are shot from a "eating the girl out" point of view. You can't see her stomach or legs, just her face and pussy. I don't expect every picture to be shot just for me, but if you want a plain full frontal view of a girl masturbating while wearing something hot, there are precious few. So I'll get a few good pictures, but not too many. They had chances to make some really hot stuff, and completely missed. They have some nice metallic dresses. If they had put the girls in those dresses and garter belts and stockings, had them sit in a chair and pull up their dress and work out, they would have really had something. it's a shame. |
|||||
Tomoyuki Yamakawa Registred: 05.19.07 Posts: 2 |
Awesome site. I agree. |
|||||
car957 Registred: 03.28.09 Posts: 2 |
The content is lacking. It's not worth the price. Frankly it's a ripoff |
|||||