Babysittered.com

The main membership page is interesting. At the top of it is a message, which I can only assume is from the admin, informing members that we don't need to feel guilty for our desire to fuck these hot young women who, if anything, are our employees. That we aren't "dirty bastards," and that even if we are, we should embrace it. More interesting, however, is the fact that they seem to hint they're open to member feedback on upcoming episodes, as they say, "Let us know what you want to see next; we will make that come true!" Sounds great to me.

Aside from that decidedly warm welcome, what really caught my eye about the page was how straight-forward it was. Instead of bogging us down with endless links and navigational gadgets, they've stuck to the basics, giving us links to the latest updates and a very simple main menu. All of this, I should add, is set to a very tasteful looking backdrop. Works for me.

I decided it'd be best if I give the model index an ol' looksie first, as the babysitters and nannies really are the key to this site. Well, I was surprised to find that there's only 7 girls currently listed. I have to say, though, that it's one hell of a group of gals, so I guess they're going for quality over quantity at the moment. It seems to be an even mixture of young, naive "babysitter" types like Willow Hayes and Sara Luvv, and seasoned MILFs like Helly Mae Hellfire and Allison Moore to fill the "nanny" roles. Also, each girl's page gives a nice list of vital statistics and information, which is always a nice touch. Overall, I see the makings of a very well rounded model roster.

But don't let the low numbers of the model index fool you. There may only be 7 girls listed, but they've used a whole lot more in their scenes. I'm not sure if this is down to the fact that they just haven't gotten around to updating the model index, or that they're only choosing to incorporate certain girls in their stable, but I'd estimate there's at least 30 different performers featured on site. In fact, I just finished watching a really yummy scene featuring a hot little firecracker named Teanna Smile. A girl who was nowhere to be found in the model index. Go figure.

Speaking of the scenes, one of the things I really love about this content is the wide variety of scenarios they've managed to milk out of their concept. I mean, it would be easy to just have every scene being a naive young girl being manipulated by an old sociopathic father, but they've done so much more than that. Often times it's the sitter who is seducing the parents. It's also not uncommon to see the wives brought into the fray, which makes for some interesting pairings of MILFs and teen pornstars.

Also, unlike a lot of sites these days that seem to forgo dialogue and plot, instead jumping right into the action, Babysittered.com seems to be more in line with old school porn, using plot and dialogue to create a world. This, in my opinion, makes the build up to the acts all the hotter. I should also add that they shoot things in a very cinematic style, with great lighting and multiple camera angles. So you won't have to worry about a static camera in a dim room, which hardly compliments modern HD quality.

Speaking of which, every single update on the site is available in both 720p and 1080p high-definition, and they were also good enough to include a nice SD Windows Media file for those of you with less than stellar Internet connections. Of course, there's a mobile file, too, which looked great on my phone. I should also add that all of these options are available for streaming, too, save for the "low quality" Windows Media file.

Going back to the content for a moment, though, I think it's worth pointing out that the material here is fast-paced and hardcore. It's not uncommon to see multiple girls slobbing on a knob simultaneously, and rim-jobs aren't out of the question, either. I was also surprised at the number of FFM scenarios. The latter should really be a plus if you enjoy that sort of thing. Personally, I'd like to see a little more MMF, but I can see how it'd be harder to cook up scenarios where that sort of thing plays. Although, given the creativity I've seen here, I'm sure these guys have a few ideas up their sleeve. I'll be keeping my fingers crossed.

As great as all that is, I did have a few points of minor concern. Firstly, you'll find nothing in the way of photo galleries on the site, so if you're into still photography, you're out of luck(that's really not such a big deal for me, however, so I let it slide). Secondly, there are no timestamps on these updates, making it nearly impossible to gauge an accurate update schedule.

The latter point is particularly troubling since there are currently only 10 updates on the site. At first I assumed this was due to it being new to scene, but without any date markings to indicate such, I have to wonder. In either case, I can see how this would be disconcerting for their members.

Also, with so little material and no bonus content in sight, it makes it hard to give this site my full recommendation just yet. Even if the content it currently has is absolutely top notch . . . . Which it is.