Girls Next Door Club

Girls Next Door Club does a fine job of catering to those who appreciate natural young women, as well as those who need their content to be clear, crisp, shot with cutting edge equipment, and delivered in a high-res, high-definition package. The body of their work seems to be focused on "innocent" little girls and the things they do when left to their own devices for just a little too long. There's also some girl-on-girl action, and, to a lesser extent, guy-on-girl and F.F.M threesomes. However, based on their current output, it's pretty clear their main focus is on solo masturbation. And if you're going to go that route, you're going to want to make sure you have absolutely top-notch models. They do.

Given all that, I suppose it should come as no surprise that their model stable isn't the biggest in the land — quality over quantity, after all. As I write this, there's only 12 girls listed under the model index. As if to make up for their barely double-digit numbers, they've given us a variety-pack of hotties from around the globe, girls from the U.S., Canada, France, Italy, Russia, the Czech Republic — you name it. What all of these lovely ladies have in common, though, is their beauty, youth, and all-natural bods. And by "all natural," I mean no breast augmentation or cosmetic surgery. On the other hand, there are a few few girls with tattoos and body piercings, but nothing so extreme as to take away from that "girl-next-door" vibe. Hell, if anything, the occasional wild-child makes for nice contrast during the girl-on-girl scenes.

The main thing that really sets these scenes apart is great cinematography and lighting. The tour page says they use "the very best equipment," and it shows. Scenes usually have zero dialogue, instead relying almost exclusively on the visual. This means scenes are often fast-paced, and 100% action oriented. Also, great use of multiple camera setups and seamless editing techniques allows us get a nice back-and-forth between close-up penetration shots and the model's face(s). I guess one of the advantages of using great gear is that can capture details you'd ordinarily only see if the model were right in front of your eyeballs — a decided bonus when you're working with girls of this caliber, girls who are as close as any of us can hope to being "flawless." On that note, downloads are available in the Windows Media and Quicktime formats, both, of course, with their own 720p and 1080p HD files so you can savor every detail. But if you're on a slower connection, computer, or you're using a mobile device, don't go running off just yet. There's a wide array of SD and mobile files, too.

For whatever reason, it seems common practice these days to offer a world of choices when it comes to video formats and resolutions, but to then leave the user high and dry in your photography section. Fortunately for us, whoever runs this seem seems to be aware that some of us still enjoy still photography. Pictures can be viewed on-site in 3 separate resolutions, going from 1,000 to 3,000 pixels. And the compressed downloads(ZIPs) do one better, offering a ultra-high-res(5,184x3,156 pixels!) version of the set. Like the videos, the galleries are lean and mean, holding just under 100 photographs. Not an out-of-this-world count by any means, but I'd imagine there's a few hundred more that just didn't make cut. And aside from the, in my opinion, excessive amount of face shots in a few of the solo galleries, I'd have to say I'm happy with the results.

As great as this sites content is, it's still not without its flaws. The first area that, I think, could do with some improvement, is the layout. Now, I understand the site is only 9 months old so, in the grand scheme of things, it's still a "baby." So, you could argue that sophisticated navigation tools aren't yet necessary. Fair enough. However, I think the current setup is a bit too short-sighted. Especially with their current update schedule. On the tour, they promise weekly updates, but they've more than delivered. In fact, they've turned in at least 8 updates a month for the last 5 straight. So, I think they should probably do a little more than two lousy buttons. At the very least, they could separate the videos and photos into two separate categories. As is, it's a little confusing.

The model index could use a little work, too; profiles give a country of birth, age, first name, and a brief bio. Half the time, though, the bio does nothing more than reiterate her age and nationality, then tell you how beautiful she is. I'm not asking for the world, but I know they can do better than that.

The most pressing issue at the moment, however, is the fact that there's just not a lot of content here. I mean, they've managed to produce 44 scenes and 50 sets, which is an admirable feat for a site who has such rigid quality controls and is also only 9 months old, but with a $19.95-a-month fee and no bonus content in sight, it's a tough sell, nevertheless.