Just Nips

I'm digging the layout of the members' area. They kept it fairly simple, putting the main menu on the left-hand side of the page and wisely letting a pair of picture perfect, elaborately tattooed 34CC breasts take center stage. And if you can will yourself to lower your gaze a few inches, you'll find links to the latest videos and photo galleries. And that's pretty much all there is to it. Which is fine by me. I came here to look at tits, not solve a bloody riddle.

Since the tour spent several paragraphs talking up their diverse group of amateur models, I figured the model index was the logical place to start. As it turns out, there's over 500 girls to choose from, and, just as the tour promised, they vary wildly in age and physical appearance. I did see a few girls who probably could establish a legitimate modeling career if they wanted to, but most of gals have more of that "average girl on the street" vibe, which, for me personally, is much sexier than the whole porn star thing.

Most importantly of all, though, is the fact that we get a delicious selection of knockers to choose from. The tour page said something about there being no "normal" when it comes to women's breasts. Well, they think Just Nips did a terrific job getting this point across via their model selection. Just minutes ago I was looking at a young, innocent looking babe with 34DD tits. It's a fairly common cup size, particularly in porn, but the differences was night and day when compared to a gorgeous MILF sporting the exact same cup-size. The young girl's were teardrop shaped and had large areolas; the MILF had smaller nipples her breasts were much closer to the "ideal" shape we see in porn.

Of course, we also see a lot of variety in cup sizes, too. A lot of boob sites seem to focus on large tits, and this one certainly has its share of impressively sized tits, but this site also has plenty of models with very small breasts. Hell, there's a few girls who are practically flat-chested. Factor in that many of them also look quite young, and there's definite crossover appeal for fans of the teen genre. You'll also see the opposite end of the spectrum represented. I couldn't help but notice a few obese models with ridiculously large bra sizes. Couldn't help but cum to them either . . . .

That's another thing. When I realized the site did mostly single-model content — albeit with a healthy dose of light girl-on-girl thrown into the mix as well — I was concerned that the repetitive nature(hey, a girl can only do so much solo) would cause it to quickly grow stale for me. As it turns out, I couldn't have been more wrong.

Whoever produces these scenes does an excellent job of mixing up the action, as well as finding creative new ways to shine the spotlight on the site's main niche: natural female breasts. Naturally, they pull out all the cheap tricks — mashing them together whilst arching the back, slow-mo jiggle shots, and the always impressive "mush them up against a pane of glass situated an inch from lens" routine — but the main thing that makes these scenes stand out is that the models are real girls, stripped of any of the pretense or bogus lust that, in my opinion, totally kills a lot of the so-called "professional" single-model content out there. Basically, if you find yourself aroused at the idea of a nervous, girl-next-door type stripping for the camera and doing their best to be sensual and erotic, you'll probably dig this content. It's the real deal.

Since the site's inception just over 4 years ago, they've been producing fairly high quality content. During my last visit I remember seeing 640 x 480 Quicktime files. I don't know if they've redid their entire archive or what, but from the earliest scene to the latest, I'm finding nothing but good looking 720p HD MPEG-4 files. These babies are crystal clear, and look great in full-screen mode. The file sizes can be a bit on the high side, usually falling just short of a gig, but during my latest visit download speeds have been consistently fast, averaging at 3 megs-per-second. The same was true for streaming video, too, which was smooth and buffer-free.

Likewise, the photo galleries are fairly consistent in terms of resolution size and overall quality. Also, just because these images feature amateur models that doesn't mean they also have to feature amateur photographers. I was pleased to find that in the bulk of these sets whoever was behind the lens did a terrific job of bringing out the best in these gals. In addition to nailing most of the technical aspects of photography, he was also smart enough to usually throw some killer ass and pussy shots into the sets

Another thing this site has going for it is a very sizeable and continually growing archive dating all the way back to early 2011. There's currently 1513 scenes and 665 sets and counting, and as I write this the last update was less than week ago. So, I'd say those numbers expanding quite a bit in the coming months is a damn safe bet.

All that having been said, there were a few areas of the site that were less perfect. One thing that really bothered me was a lack of options in general. I mean, as much I liked the simplistic approach taken with the layout, I can't say I wanted that to carry over to video and photo options. Currently most scenes and sets can only be viewed or downloaded in a lone resolution and format. The addition of a few SD options, perhaps even a mobile option, would be a great addition.

I also wasn't a big fan of the fact that video and picture updates have nothing in the way of timestamps, making tracking their update history a real pain in the ass. Not to mention it is, no doubt, disconcerting for newer members. It seems strangely inconsistent, too, considering that the "Live Site Stats" section on the homepage gives up to date video and image statistics, including the date of the latest video/photo entry.