More beautiful faces than you can count, engaged in yet even more scenes, both hardcore and softcore, and in vivid high-definition quality. I love it!
Site type: Pay site, category: PornStars
Complete review published on 12.27.2017
Be the first to write a comment
Click here to visit site
Are plain jane amateurs and bizarre looking porn stars just not doing it for you anymore? Then perhaps what you need is a site inhabited by real Stunners.com. A site that promises an "escape to a world filled with only the most beautiful models!" Not to mention "vivid HD" delivered 4 times a week, and "super high-resolution photos." Factor in the somewhat unusual addition of hardcore, and this glam site looks almost too good to be true. So, let's find out if it, shall we?
[v]Content Amount(5)Last updated on April 28, 2018.
Over 1068 videos about 15 minutes each (download)
DRM: No restrictions
+ Full Movies, Multi-Bandwidth
WMV (4400kb/s, 1280x720)
QuickTime (3000kb/s, 1280x720)
WMV (5000kb/s, 640x360)
QuickTime (3800kb/s, 640x360)
Over 2209 galleries about 150 pictures each
+ Fullscreen pictures, Video captures, Zip archives
Bonus Sites, Model Index, Message Board, Live Chat
Since the mainstay of any site bold enough to call itself Stunners.com surely must be its models. So that is where I'll start. Scanning the model index — which, I might add, is well organized and quite informative — I see 560 drop-dead-gorgeous women, most of whom are in their late teens and early-to-mid twenties, and most of whom are of European descent. Though there are a few exotic beauties thrown in, just to spice things up. I even spied a few stars in the mix. One thing all these ladies have in common, however, is that they're ridiculously good looking.
Hot models are all good and well, but only if they've been put to good use. Thankfully, it would seem whoever is in charge of production has been a busy bee, as there are, as I write this, 1068 scenes and 2209 galleries dating back to early 2012. And these numbers will only continue to grow, and at a rapid pace if stick to their current update schedule. A schedule which, I might add, often exceeds its tour ledge of 4 updates-per-week.
What's more, I've found consistently good play-back quality throughout most of the archive, with most of the latest updates coming in HD. The latest updates are available in a fantastic looking HD video. Even the earliest updates are available in 720p HD. In fact, my only complaint would be that they haven't progressed to 1080p yet. But perhaps that's next on their agenda? One can only hope.
The photo galleries were great. On average you can expect 150 high-res shots, with the option of downloading the full gallery in a ZIP file. I also want to commend them for making their watermarks small and unobtrusive. Now, if only they'd add a few more resolution options ....
Going back to their videos for a moment, though, I must confess I was quite dismayed to find zero options for streaming. This is quite odd as I found download speeds were lightning fast, so surely they can handle it? And while we're on the subject, a few more formats options would be nice.
Also, I hate to say it, but the content, while usually maintaining high production values and always the finest of models, can be, at times, a bit vanilla. Think early '90s porn with all the awful trapping: cheesy music, over-the-top plots, and action that is, sad to say, typical for the hardcore genre, and you'll be on the right track. I could also swear I've seen a few of these scenes elsewhere, which begs the question: are these scenes exclusive?
Also, though navigation is basic and user-friendly, it's perhaps a little too basic for a site that houses such numbers. A few more browse-tools would be nice. Hell, just a few common sense fixes would do wonders. For instance, they could add dates — more information in general, really — to the their updates list. I mean, it's not like they have anything to hide. Their update schedule is spectacular. So, I'll just chalk it up to a lackluster web design.
Also, as much as it pains me to admit, a few "not so hot" babes slipped through the cracks. I suppose that's inevitable with a model index of this magnitude, but it, nevertheless, cannot be ignored. Cetainly not when the main premise of this site is its supposed abundance of top-shelf pussy. Still, I think the number of supreme hotties outweighs the mingers, so I'm willing to overlook the bad apples. Contrast is necessary for beauty, anyway.
On a more sunny note, your membership affords you access to 10 bonus sites. It's a fine lot, too, including such prestigious titles as Cum Hungry Cocksuckers and Stolen Porn Videos.
Going by their tour claims, which were, admittedly, a bit on the vague side, I went in expecting one thing and one thing only: obscenely hot women. And on that front, Stunners.com delivered. They've also provided outstanding numbers, thanks in no small part to their frequent and regular update schedule. Hot as their models are, though, the content is, at times, a little vanilla. Similarly, their layout is a bit inadequate. Particularly for a site of this size and stature. All things considered, though, I'd happily recommend this site to anyone who values high caliber models above all else.
Click here to visit Stunners.com