I Kiss Girls

The members' area at I Kiss Girls is straight-forward and user-friendly. Everything is neatly arranged, and the main menu, which limits itself to the bare necessities, is simple enough that my 80-year-old grandmother could figure it out. So, I won't bore you with anymore talk of the layout.

I mean, we came here for the steamy girl-on-girl erotica, not the browse-tools, right? Well, I'm happy to report that whoever is directing these scenes really understands the art of the slow burn. The scenes usually start out with the girl slowly undressing each other, then delving into lots of heavy petting and sensual mouth kissing. Of course, they eventually start kissing each other's pussies, too, but not until they've had a whole lot of passionate foreplay.

Of course, if you really want to do top-notch erotica properly, you have to have truly talented performers. And this site does — gals like Georgia Jones, Faye Reagan, and Jelena Jensen. In fact, there's just under 80 models, altogether. Each girl has her own page, and aside from linking to all of the model's content, it also has a a lot of information, including a list of likes and dislikes very reminiscent of old school skin mags. You know, "turn ons: washboard abs, turn offs: obvious toupees."

As I mentioned earlier, they keep things pretty simple in the navigation department. As such, content is divided into two categories: videos and pictures. At the time of this review there's 124 and 116 photo galleries. Each section updates once a week, so you can expect plenty of new content.

I checked out the videos first. One thing I noticed right off the bat is that scenes can be downloaded in 5 different resolution sizes and two different formats. Resolutions range from 320p mobile files all the way up to 1080p HD MPEG-4s. The 720p files can be downloaded in your choice of either the MPEG-4 or Windows Media format. I thought this was an especially nice touch, since I know a lot of people hate it when they can't get their downloads the latter format. Personally, I was disappointed that scenes can only be streamed in a smaller, more average resolution(852 x 480). Download speeds were pretty middle-of-the-road, too, clocking in at around 1.5 megs-per-second.

The photo galleries usually hold around 200 images. As with the videos, the images that can be viewed on site aren't all that big(800 x 533 pixels). Also like the videos, though, you can download these babes in a much larger resolution size. The current choices are large(1,333 x 2,000 pixels) and "xlarge" (1,999 x 3,000 pixels). But since these scenes feature that usually feature a fairly slow build up, you can expect a lot of tame, semi-redundant shots on the first page of the gallery. But once things heat up, you'll begin to find keeper shots in abundance.

My only minor gripe would be that while the minimalistic layout works now, I doubt it will once the site has filled out a bit more. I mean, they don't even have a search engine or niche tags. Currently the only filters are date and rating. That's just not going to cut it once their numbers rise. And with new updates coming in 8 times a month, that navigational overhaul is going be needed sooner rather than later.