Nude Art[Visit site]
With the right combination of model, setting, and photographer, real magic can happen. Especially if those models are young, flawless and fully nude.
Complete review published on 04.27.2014
Be the first to write a comment
Click here to visit site
Nude Art doesn't try to get you to join by using a fancy spiel or a bunch of empty promises. No, they let their content do the talking. Outside of that snazzy offer of 4 sites for the price of one, the tour is nearly text free, with the focus on those flawless, natural young models and the awesome photography skills used to capture them at their best. As it should be.
[v]Content Amount(4)Last updated on June 12, 2014.
Yes about 4 minutes each (stream only)
Over 244 galleries about 150 pictures each
+ Fullscreen pictures, Zip archives
[v]PricesLast updated on June 12, 2014.
29.95€ / one month (recurring)
74.95€ / three months (recurring)
254.9€ / one year (non-recurring)
$97 / three months(by wire) (non-recurring)
$80 / three months(cash in envelope) (non-recurring)
The first thing that really caught my eye about this site when viewing the tour, and again once inside the cozey confines of the members area, was just how awesome their model lineup really is. It goes without saying that these girls are all easy on the eyes. What sets them apart, though, is that they're all natural as well. I don't think I ran into a single fake boob during my stay. Better still, these girls are young and fresh. Many have that innocent, girl next door vibe that, for me at least, is just irresistibly hot. Don't me wrong, though. The site was wise enough to throw a few bad apples into the mix. You'll occasionally even see a girl with a few tattoos or piercings — sometimes both.
There's plenty to go around, too. By my count there's 244 sets on the site. Since most sets contain, at minimum, 125 shots — and many hold over 200 — I'd estimate there's easily over 25,000 photographs here. Not too shabby, eh? Particularly if you take into account the quality of these images — even just from the standpoint of their raw specs. Every set can be viewed in three different resolutions: Low(800 x 533), medium(2,048 x 1,365), and high(4,752 x 3,168). To be fair, the older sets have slightly different stats. For instance, on the first update the "high" option is only 2,592 x 3,888 pixels. But that's still damn impressive, and really not that far off, either.
Of course, all of that wouldn't mean a thing if the photos were shot by some hack. Fortunately for us, nothing could be further from the truth. You can tell whoever is doing the shooting really gets the most out of their models. Which can't be easy when you're shooting relatively straight nudes. They've managed to pull it off, though. I pleased to find that, while these babies are of a consistently high quality from set-to-set, they've, nevertheless, managed to mix it up quite a bit. Settings and lighting, for example, vary wildly between sets. One minute you may be looking at a gallery with a glamorous blonde in a luxurious suite, the next some dirty brunette striking provocative poses in a dimly bathroom. And on that note, they also do a good job of making their erotica photography feel kind of dirty. I can't quite put my finger on how they do it. Perhaps it's all those lovely closeups of shaved pussies?
I was surprised to find no video on the site, whatsoever. I can't say that I was all that disappointed, though, because it's been my experience that most photography sites just include footage of the photo shoots, which are usually plagued by annoying flashes and shutter clicks. Personally, I can live without them. However, I know a lot of you really enjoy seeing the live action footage, and it does seem a bit odd that they've left it out. Hard to hold it against them, though, since they made no explicit promises of video on the tour.
The layout, on the other hand, definitely needs some attention. Once logged in I found myself staring at a page that, aside from a few minor differences, is aesthetically identical to what you see on the tour. This gave me mixed feelings. I mean, I'm all for tour transparency, but this setup is far too basic. And that's coming from a guy who appreciates a good minimalist design. A simple but effective setup is always nice in my book, but there's just some things you can't do without. You know, like some basic browse-tools. In fact, it would seem having some way of filtering the content to find your "perfect" girl would be ideal on a site of this nature. But there is none.
Worse still, they didn't bother to include a model index, which, on a site full of high caliber hotties, is a move I'll never, ever understand. If you ask me, they totally dropped the ball there. It just seems like such a no-brainer. But even that I can overlook. It is, admittedly, quite fun, scrolling through page-after-page, finding a new beauty at every turn. What's not so amusing, however, is an archive full of updates with no timestamps. As you can imagine, it makes it difficult to track their update schedule, and I'm sure it has to be disconcerting to new members.
On a more positive note, your membership gives you access to 3 additional sites: Class 3some, Class Blowjob, and Oldje.com. And while none of them quite compare to Nude Art when it comes to still photography, they do provide much harder content, and in 720p, too. So, you'll get a nice, balanced diet of smut.
If you adore the female form, or even if you're just a fan of really well done photography, you should be able to appreciate what this site has to offer. The model selection alone is enough to make you sit up and take notice. I don't know where they get these girls, but they rival the best of 'em. I can see some being annoyed by the simplistic layout — no model index? really? — or the lack of videos, but factor in the nice 720p HD available on those 3 bonus sites, and I think it more than evens out. All in all, Nude Art is definitely worth a serious looksie. Especially for you connoisseurs out there.
Click here to visit Nude Art