Sometimes I log into these networks, and I can't help but get the impression that they have settled, become complacent knowing they have so many sites under their thumb, thinking that all they really have to do to achieve success is sit back and let those suckers crank out content. Girls Way Network
is the polar opposite of that. Once you've logged in you can't help but notice that it is a hive of activity — but not the sort of hodge-podge conglomeration that some of the busier sites throw at you. No, this operation has direction.
When I first logged in, my eyes became locked on the animated banner giving preview of some of their latest productions, as well as an invitation to "join the conversation" in their discussion boards where members can "submit fantasies" and "cast votes for their favorite models." That latter part helped better explain that GOTM(Girl-of-the-Month) section I noticed in the main menu and why adorable brunette Gina Valentina(March 2019's GOTM) was so prominently displayed throughout the main page. Another thing that became instantly clear was just how often they were adding new updates. There were 23 last month, 23 more the month before that, and there have already been nearly 20 in the first two weeks of this month alone. What made this even more impressive was the sheer quality of these productions. I don't know how they manage it, but I sure hope they keep it up.
The network is comprised of 6 unique lesbian sites: Mommy's Girl, Moms on Moms, Web Young, Girls Try Anal
, Sex Tape Lesbians
, and Girlsway
Originals. As I'm sure you can already tell, they've got all their bases covered: old/young incest, teens, dildos and strap-ons, even the hidden-camera/home movie genre. Most of these sites are still quite active, too, with Mommy's Girl and Web Young posting an average of 4-5 new updates each month, and Girlsway
Originals more than doubling those figures all by its lonesome. So, I suppose it's no small wonder that network as a whole has over 561 scenes and 1834 photo galleries to choose from.
But before we delve too deeply into the fun stuff, I think it is worth taking a moment to appreciate just how awesome their layout is. Earlier I made mention of that Girl-of-the-Month business, but it goes far beyond that. One of the first things you're likely to notice upon logging in is that each episode has a little icon attached. Mommy's Girl, for instance, uses a little peach and Web Young a pink, W/Y combo designed to resemble a woman's breast and midriff area. Even cooler than that, however, are the labels denoting that certain scenes are a "Model Debut," "Member's Fantasy," "Director's Debut," or "Director's Cut." All of the browse-tools and filters certainly make a fine-tuned browsing experience a lot easier, but it's these unique little touches that really let you know this isn't just another run-of-the-mill porno network.
One thing this network has always nailed is its choice in models. Whether they be MILF, teens, or anything in between, there is always one constant: a willingness to go that extra mile for the scene. As expected, there were more than a few famous porn stars in the mix, but what really thrilled me were all those names I didn't recognize. There were so many gorgeous girls who, while they may be relative unknowns, were supremely talented, often possessing an almost supernatural screen presence. And in addition to the picture perfect blondes most guys dream about, there was an abundance of ethnic babes, even some alternative types, their flesh like tapestries, adorned with tattoos and body piercings. Simply put, if there is a certain lesbian pairing you've dreamed about, they have probably already filmed it.
The production values have always been on another level, too. Styles obviously differ from site-to-site, but there is an underlying quality to the work that is ever-present. It is apparent that they hire directors with certain artistic sensibilities, as these episodes have obviously underwent a level of planning and attention to detail that is unusual in this high-octane, reality porn world. But I think their slower pace and more cinematic aesthetic better lends itself to the sort of intimate girl-on-girl encounters that take place here.
Even the earliest episodes can be downloadeded in your choice of 7 different resolutions, ranging from a lowly 160p all the way up to dazzling 720p and 1080p high-definition quality. These same options are made available for streaming, and the embedded player also has added benefit of allowing you to mark specific points in the timeline, so you can come back to where you left off or even just revisit your favorite parts of specific episodes. Very cool.
I was surprised to find that there were nearly twice as many photo galleries as there were videos on the network. They did not share in all the bells-and-whistle of their video brethren, but I suppose their plan was to make up for that through sheer numbers. Either way, the images sport a nice resolution size(1,280 x 1,920 pixels) and certainly capture the essence of these beauties, often in medias res, ensuring truly juicy action shots.
I think that perhaps one of the coolest aspects of this network lies in its discussion forum. It is not uncommon for sites I visit to have boards, but they usually are proverbial ghost towns. So, imagine my delight when I find one that is not only active, but has had just over 60,000 comments posted on it in the last few years. On a side note: I find browsing the boards an excellent way to spend your downtime after you've shot your wad. I had a wonderful time reading a thread on the merits of kissing in scenes and the lively debate that ensued over the exact frequency of said kissing required, "deep tongue" or otherwise.
What thrilled me to my core, though, was the constant back-and-forth on display between membership and staff. One can't help but get the impression that the members are a real guiding in force in the shaping of this network. Hell, there are whole sub-forums dedicated to just that. The model request forum, for instance, allows members to vote for and against the future use of specific models. There are even story submission boards for each site. Have yourself an idea for a kinky plot? Have at it. Who knows? You might see your idea brought to life by your favorite porn stars. Oh, and let's not forget the model Q&A section. The thread with Whitney Wright alone spans 67 pages. Try getting that level of model interaction on any other site.
So, you've read countless paragraphs of me fawning over this network. I know what you're wondering: What are its flaws? Truth be told, there aren't many. I suppose they could have been more thorough with their model index. Some girl's pages come complete with a bio, measurements, astrological sign, hobbies, links to social media — you know, the works. Other girls were not so fortunate, their pages housing nothing more than links to their content.
The only real issue I could find was the activity — or lack thereof — of a few of these sites. Girls Try Anal
hasn't updated so far this month, but it has added one update per month for the last several. Sex Tape Lesbians
, on the other hand, hasn't updated since mid-2015.
One thing I've always admired about this network is that they make their members feel like they are an integral part of the operation. So, it seemed only natural that they let them take a peek behind the curtain via a constant stream of new awesome behind-the-scenes footage. There are currently 238 bonus clips, covering everything from interviews with featured models to outtakes and bloopers.