These scenes are more than mere lesbian flings or wild romps in the sack, though. While they can and quite often do get rather nasty, there was an element of tenderness that I had not accounted for. A great example of this is a recent scene featuring Julia Ann and Brandi Love. Julia plays a paraplegic who feels like no woman could ever truly want to be intimate with her due to her physical limitations. Brandi does an excellent job of reassuring her, gentley easing her into the act of lovemaking. It was obvious these two took the subject matter very seriously, and due to their efforts the end result was actually quite touching.
I think it is also worth noting that content has improved tremendously since the site launched in 2011. In the early days, it was clear they were going for a more cinematic style, but the execution wasn't quite there yet. Despite the intricate plots, wacky dialogue, and use of mutliple camera angles, there was still a rough amateur feel that was difficult to shake.
Don't get me wrong, those early scenes were hot and damn entertaining. When comparing them to the site's latest creations, though, the difference is night and day. Yes, those years of honing their skills truly paid off and it really shines through in films like The Coven Wives and Becoming Elsa. To say I'm impressed with their progress would be an understatement.
They did a bang up job on the individual video pages, too. Each displays a cast list, cover art from the DVD, member ratings, even trailers. I also quite liked how the embedded player had the to mark specific spots in the timeline. Very cool.
Scenes can be downloaded or streamed in your choice of 7 different resolutions. The 720p and 1080p HD are obviously your go to options if bandwidth is not an issue, but if you're in a hurry or just don't care about playback quality, they've got some great looking SD files, too.
Every scene has its own attached picture gallery, yet a whole separate pictures section can be found in the main menu, and it houses more galleries than there are videos on the entire site. I'm not sure why that would be the case, though, as these images are obviously byproducts of the scenes. They even share the same resolution(1,280 x 1,920 pixels) and have no discernible edge in quality over the ones in the attached galleries. I can only surmise that they are uploading the galleries before releasing the scenes onto the site. Why? Beats the hell out of me.
So, what's wrong with this site, you ask? Well, not too awful much. I can't say I am a fan of their model index. As is, it simply serves as a way of finding a specific model's content. There is no biographical information of any sort. With such gorgeous and talented models, it is practically a sin to not give them a proper bio. I understand that it would take some time with so many models, but these ladies are worth it.
I also noticed one thing that was rather peculiar. Selecting HD Porn from the categories list only turns up 944 results. Since there are 1172 scenes, that would mean that not all of them are HD. I'm not sure if this is just an error with their categories filter or if it's accurate. The earliest scenes are available in 1080p HD, so it would seem odd that they would have randomly occuring SD-only scenes later in the archive. Since I experienced a number of errors with the other filters — particularly the DVD selector — I'm going to just assume that this is a glitch and nothing more. But if that is the case, they definitely need to take a closer look at their browse-tools.
One sweet bonus of your membership is full access to the Mile High Media
network, which, in addition to Sweetheart Video
, gives you access to 7 other raunchy little sex dens: BiEmpire
, Cherry Pop, Lesbian Older Younger
, Mile High Selection, Reality Junkies
, Doghouse Digital
, Sweet Sinner