Earl Miller

What an honor to get to review the site of this photographer! I remember having Penthouse magazines and looking through the pages and seeing all the photographer credits and thinking "what I wouldn't give to be these guys!" He has my dream job! Now he's brought his magic online so we can see him capture the essence of human sexuality and glamour erotica in his own unique style.

Logging into the member's area you can see the latest site updates. The site is updated 6 days a week with fresh, new content. Each day of the week represents a certain type of update: Monday - Girl of the Week, Tuesday - Shoot of the Week, Wednesday - Amateur of the Week, Thursday - Video Update, Friday - Video Update, Saturday - Bonus Stuff.

The site navigation is excellent. They've got it laid out very well so you can instantly get to what you're looking for. They offer both a searchable database by category of type of pictures that you want to see or by model name. The videos are also set apart by category too.

Of course the main feature of this site is the pictures. On most amateur porn sites it is the videos, but since Earl Miller is such a professional at shooting erotica, the pictures are going to be the best feature on the site. I started by checking out the monthly centerfold. Each pictoral features a comment of the shoot by Earl himself. I think that's a nice little personal touch. The pictures come in three different resolutions: 800 pixels, 1024 pixels, and 1280 pixels. Notice that these dimensions are also the exact same to match most computer screen settings, so you can actually save the pictures you like and make them your desktop wallpaper!

At any rate, Earl Miller is still using film on some of the photographs and not digital images. I say this because certain pictures have a black border around them on one side. Also the pictures are extremely compressed for the Internet. I am quite disappointed that a 1280 image would have such compression and a "matte" look to it on the web. Some of them even look quite blurry! With digital photos it is so crystal clear that you can see every hair on their bodies. Who am I to criticize his photography? Absolutely no one. This isn't a reflection of his photography, but merely how the pictures translate to the web. Being a web designer myself, I can tell the amount of compression on the photos and it really takes away from their value. Obviously photo scanned pictures are not going to look as good as digital on the Internet. I'm only stating the obvious.

The photography itself is nothing short of amazing! Even though all of the images I looked at are annoyingly blurry (Courtney Cummz, Tall Goddess & Eva) that is not a refection of his photography. Earl Miller should fire his web designer or whomever translates his pictures to the web because he is much too good to have such poor quality images on the Internet! The models are beautiful, all professionally made up, and the action is intense! I looked a lot of girl/girl images and the way he captures such beautiful women eating pussy.

Besides all of the images, there are bonus materials that you can enjoy. They've got some Vivid Video On Demand. Vivid is one of the largest adult video companies who puts out titles for people such as Jenna Jameson. They've got kind of a neat feature called "Before They Were Porn Stars" and it has amateur shots of famous porn stars while they were still up and comers such as: Taylor St. Claire, Barrett Moore, and Briana Banks.

Also in their bonus section they have some streaming videos by a company called "Ademia". I'm really surprised to see them still around, I thought they went out of business years ago. However they still have some really great movies of famous pornstars such as Dave Cummings, Bridget The Midget, and Mr. 18" Cock.

All in all it's a cool site to peruse if you're a big porn star fan. You'll know all the names and faces of the models and see them in exclusive pictures you probably haven't seen before. The quality of the photos are superior, but the quality of how they're put on the web is sub-standard. I've seen less blurry shots on amateur sites. At any rate, the site is worth the money for the exclusive pictures you'll find!